ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Ken Cook

Ken Cook is president of Environmental Working Group, a public interest research and advocacy organization known for its Farm Subsidy Database. The author of dozens of articles, opinion pieces and reports on agricultural, public health and environmental topics, "[Cook's] fingerprints can be found on nearly two decades of U.S. farm law" (Omaha World Herald). Read more about Ken.

Craig Cox

Craig Cox is EWG Midwest Vice President. He Mulches from EWG's office in Ames, IA. Prior to EWG, Craig served as Executive Director of the Soil and Water Conservation Society and was Acting USDA Deputy Under-Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, and Special Assistant to the Chief of USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Michelle Perez

Michelle Perez is EWG's Senior Agriculture Analyst. She has a BA in Biology from Occidental, a Masters from the University of Maryland (UMD) and is finishing up a PhD in agricultural-environmental policy at UMD.

Don Carr

Don Carr is EWG's Press Secretary for agriculture and public lands issues. Prior to EWG, Don worked as a Communications Director for the DNC in his home state of South Dakota and on former Senate Leader Tom Daschle's 2004 reelection campaign.

Stay connected

Get our monthly eNewsletter, farm policy updates, & the latest farm news. [Privacy policy]


« But Who's Counting? | << Back to main page | Half of Farm Subsidies Go To Twenty-Two Congressional Districts »

NE-3 Tops in 2005 Subsidies

There's a nice piece today (subscription required) by Robert Pore in the Grand Island Independent on the EWG Farm Subsidy Database's tally of farm subsidy payments for 2005 to Nebraska's enormous 3rd Congressional District, now held by Rep. Tom Osborne. Congressman-elect Adrian Smith will take over when the 110th Congress convenes in January.

Here's a look at NE-3's profile from the 2002 Census of Agriculture. This is a good example of how a districts's ranking based on the market value of agricultural products sold matches up with the subsidy ranking: the top ranking for subsidies in 2005 jives with the district's #2 ranking in 2002 for market value of agricultural products sold.

But you wonder how enthused all those NE-3 cattlemen and other livestock producers will be about proposals to continue big crop subsidy payments if those payments come on top of the high market prices the animal protein world is facing now now for corn and soybeans. The value of livestock products in NE-3 considerably exceeds the value of crops.

Maybe the district's livestock producers would prefer to see more investment in federal conservation and rural development programs instead?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)