cityslickers_inset.jpg

ABOUT KEN

Ken Cook is president of Environmental Working Group, a public interest research and advocacy organization known for its Farm Subsidy Database. The author of dozens of articles, opinion pieces and reports on agricultural, public health and environmental topics, "[Cook's] fingerprints can be found on nearly two decades of U.S. farm law" (Omaha World Herald). Read more about the authors.

Stay connected

Get our monthly eNewsletter, farm policy updates, & the latest farm news. [Privacy policy]


Search the database

Search by city


Search by zip code

Search by beneficiaries's name
(last)
(first)

Search by business name

MULCH VIA EMAIL

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

« EWG President on NPR's Marketplace | << Back to main page | "A good day for those who want
to write the farm bill on the floor" »

Farm Bill: Unhappy Campers
At Conservation Mark-Up

From Congressional Quarterly:

Chairman’s Money Shuffle Creates Friction Over House Farm Bill Aides say members of the House Agriculture Committee are unhappy with how Chairman Collin C. Peterson has handled this year’s farm bill so far.

The dissatisfaction intensified last night 21] [May , aides said, when Peterson told panel members that his draft of the legislation would spend all of a proposed $20 billion “reserve fund” that was meant to pay for new initiatives. The announcement complicated today’s subcommittee markup of portions of the bill. Members withdrew numerous amendments because of the budgetary constraints. The Conservation, Credit, Energy, and Research Subcommittee is expected to continue its markup of the $3.8 billion conservation title of the bill throughout Tuesday afternoon.

Peterson, D-Minn., told members last night that he had spread out the $20 billion cushion across the draft bill’s 10 titles, but he would not tell members where it would go, according to aides.

The announcement frustrated both Democrats and Republicans who were counting on those funds to support new programs.

The committee can spend the extra $20 billion as long as the cost is offset somewhere else in the budget. The House leadership, however, has made no promises that it has found sufficient offsets.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)