ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Ken Cook

Ken Cook is president of Environmental Working Group, a public interest research and advocacy organization known for its Farm Subsidy Database. The author of dozens of articles, opinion pieces and reports on agricultural, public health and environmental topics, "[Cook's] fingerprints can be found on nearly two decades of U.S. farm law" (Omaha World Herald). Read more about Ken.

Craig Cox

Craig Cox is EWG Midwest Vice President. He Mulches from EWG's office in Ames, IA. Prior to EWG, Craig served as Executive Director of the Soil and Water Conservation Society and was Acting USDA Deputy Under-Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, and Special Assistant to the Chief of USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Michelle Perez

Michelle Perez is EWG's Senior Agriculture Analyst. She has a BA in Biology from Occidental, a Masters from the University of Maryland (UMD) and is finishing up a PhD in agricultural-environmental policy at UMD.

Don Carr

Don Carr is EWG's Press Secretary for agriculture and public lands issues. Prior to EWG, Don worked as a Communications Director for the DNC in his home state of South Dakota and on former Senate Leader Tom Daschle's 2004 reelection campaign.

Stay connected

Get our monthly eNewsletter, farm policy updates, & the latest farm news. [Privacy policy]


« Editorials Blast House Farm Bill | << Back to main page | SF Chronicle Dubs Farm Bill
"Continued Welfare for Wealthy Farmers" Bill »

BREAKING: USDA Employees Organize Lobbying Campaign
To Strip Civil Rights Provision from Farm Bill

Some USDA employees, including a top official in the department, are organizing a lobbying campaign to eliminate a provision in the farm bill passed July 27 by the House of Representatives that would reopen a landmark civil rights case against the department for discrimination in providing farm loans to black farmers.

The provision under challenge would allow up to 73,000 black farmers another chance to pursue discrimination claims that were disqualified without review on their merits because they were filed after a court-mandated deadline.

The USDA employees lobbying to remove the provision work for the very agency black farmers sued in the 1990s for discrimination in providing low-interest government loans to farmers who have trouble getting commercial credit.

"As you all know by now, the House version of the Farm Bill will reopen
the Pigford lawsuit to allow late filers to be considered," wrote Kim DePasquale, an official with the department's Fredericksburg service center, in an Aug. 2 email to 40 fellow employees of USDA's Farm Service Agency. "I was really surprised by this. It makes me wish I was not part of this agency. If I feel this way, I'm sure others do too."

Ms. DePasquale verified to EWG in a phone conversation that she sent the email from a government computer, and that she'd received a version of it from another government computer.

Added in last-minute bargaining just before the House farm bill was considered on the floor and after pressure was applied by the Congressional Black Caucus, the provision will allow black farmers disqualified for late filing under the Pigford v. USDA settlement an opportunity to make their case, on the merits, that they were denied USDA loans as a result of racial discrimination. The provision also requires USDA to provide plaintiffs information that could help the court determine if black farmers were treated unfairly in comparison to similarly situated white farmers who did receive farm loans.

The inability of black farmers to access such information from USDA has been a major reason why so many of them have been unable to prove discrimination and obtain relief under the Pigford settlement process.

The House farm bill also caps all settlements under the provision to $100 million in total payments, sufficient for 2,000 claims if each receives the "automatic" $50,000 provided for "fast track" Pigford claimants.

Except for the settlement cap, the provision in the House farm bill is very similar to separate legislation, the Pigford Settlement Claims Act, introduced in the House by Reps. Bobbie Scott (D-VA) and Steve Chabot (R-OH), and championed by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-MI). The legislation was introduced following a series of congressional hearings that documented, among other problems, serious inadequacies in the effort to notify black farmers about the Pigford settlement process, resulting in tens of thousands of late claims, nearly all of which were rejected without consideration of their merits. A similar senate bill has been introduced by Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA) and Barack Obama (D-IL).

Congressional interest in the case was reignited by this 2004 report by the Environmental Working Group and the National Black Farmers Association.

In the email, USDA employee DePasquale states that "NACS has just spoken to [top USDA official] Carolyn Cooksie concerning the inclusion of another Pigford Bill attached to the House's version of the Farm Bill. She said it is "awful" and will allow some 73,000 late filers in and we will probably have another class action suit."

NACS, the National Association of Credit Specialists, is a professional association of USDA employees who administer the department's credit programs. Cooksie is the Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs at USDA. DePasquale added:

The agency will be required to submit a boatload of information within 60 days of anyone filing which will bury us! Not to mention, most of this information we don't have. Carolyn is doing a lot of legwork in the Senate trying to stop it but NACS, NASE, and other FSA employees need to contact their Senators and work hard to get it stopped.

DePasquale concluded her email with a call to action and a reminder that USDA computers and phones should not be used in the lobbying campaign. Her email was date-stamped during business hours (11:23 a.m., Thursday, Aug. 2). Ironically, DePasquale acknowledged to EWG that she used a government computer to send it.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATOR TODAY CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING: DO NOT ALLOW LATE FILERS ON THE PIGFORD LAWSUIT. AMPLE TIME AND OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN DURING THE INITIAL SUIT TO FILE AND THIS LATE FILING WOULD BURY THE AGENCY AND COST TAXPAYERS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IF THE 73,000 LATE FILERS ARE ACCEPTED

Members, please step up and make your voice heard in this Farm Bill debate. I am willing to tell my Senators that I will not cast my vote
for anyone who will not stand up and do what's right instead of worrying
about being politically correct.
They should be fiscally responsible
and at the same time listen to their constituients! [sic] WE CAN STOP THIS IF
WE RISE UP TOGETHER AND MAKE OUR VOICE HEARD! KEEP CONTACTING THEM
UNTIL THEY HEAR YOU! MAKE SURE THEY RECEIVE YOUR MESSAGE, FAX, E-MAIL,
ETC.
Remember, don't make contacts using the office telephone or computer.
Send your contacts from home or from another location other than the
office, but send them!


EWG and the National Black Farmers Association first called attention to improper notification as a contributing factor to mass dismissal of Pigford claims in our 2004 report,Obstruction of Justice.

Deadline barred 64,000 claims, despite lack of notice.The settlement-funded arbitrator rejected 64,000 farmers who came forward with claims during the late claims process established by the court. The farmers' attorneys, whose representation was characterized by the court as "bordering on legal malpractice," were responsible for properly notifying the farmers of the original deadline for application. The settlement-funded arbitrator rejected these 64,000 farmers simply on the basis of their tardiness for the original deadline, even though all 64,000 rejected claims were submitted within the court established late claims period. An additional 7,800 farmers failed to file before the late claims deadline expired and were also denied entry to the class.

Of 270 late claims filed by black farmers in Virginia, where a campaign by a USDA employee to undo the House provision is underway, 252 (93 percent) were rejected.

Here is the original email:

From: DePasquale, Kim - Fredericksburg, VA Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 11:23 AM To: Rickman, Anne - Boydton, VA; Sanacuore, Annette - Verona, VA; Baumgardner, Matthew - Chatham, VA; Berry, David - Louisa, VA; DePasquale, Kim - Fredericksburg, VA; Lenoir-Giles, Diane - Hanover, VA; Ross, Dorine - Accomac, VA; Hamilton, Lisa - Verona, VA; Word, Jane - Boydton, VA; Puleo, Janice - Lawrenceville, VA; Davis, Jeff - Gloucester, VA; Jones, Jeff - Verona, VA; Rigney, Jimmy - Chatham, VA; Johnson, Donna - Verona, VA; Carter, Laura - Richmond, VA; Luckritz, David - Richmond, VA; Crigger, Misty - Abindton, VA; Adamson, Pete - Richmond, VA; Ramsey, Robert - Richmond, VA; Kraszewski, Ron - Chatham, VA; Saville, Beverly - Fredericksburg, VA; Hulsey, Sherry - Fredericksburg, VA; Spencer, Terry - Chatham, VA; StClair, Wes - Bedford, VA; Wiggins, Jeanny - Courtland, VA; Loxterkamp, Will - Verona, VA; Bohon, Kevin - Bonsack, VA; Roberts, Carolyn - Boydton, VA; Chetneyperault, Kathy - Richmond, VA; Church, Patricia - Accomac, VA; Brickhouse, Donald - Chatham, VA; Wright, George - Abingdon, VA; Pugh, Ida - Abingdon, VA; Dunn, James - Sussex, VA; Hinmon, Melody - Accomac, VA; Wolters, Richard - Abingdon, VA; Ricks, Alan - Courtland, VA; Stanford, Sarah - Boytdon, VA; Taylor, Robert - Fredericksburg, VA; Wooden, Mike - Richmond, VA Subject: IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

As you all know by now, the House version of the Farm Bill will reopen
the Pigford lawsuit to allow late filers to be considered. I was really
surprised by this. It makes me wish I was not part of this agency. If
I feel this way, I'm sure others do too.

NACS just spoke with Carolyn Cooksie concerning the inclusion of another
Pigford Bill attached to the House's version of the Farm Bill. She said
it is "awful" and will allow some 73,000 late filers in and we will
probably have another class action suit. The agency will be required to
submit a boatload of information within 60 days of anyone filing which
will bury us! Not to mention, most of this information we don't have.
Carolyn is doing a lot of legwork in the Senate trying to stop it but
NACS, NASE, and other FSA employees need to contact their Senators and
work hard to get it stopped. The contacts need to me made before the
debate starts in the Senate.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATOR TODAY CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING:

- REMOVE THE TERM LIMITS ON FSA LOANS IN THE NEXT FARM BILL

- DO NOT ALLOW LATE FILERS ON THE PIGFORD LAWSUIT.
AMPLE TIME AND OPPORTUNITY WAS GIVEN DURING THE INITIAL SUIT TO FILE
AND THIS LATE FILING WOULD BURY THE AGENCY AND COST TAXPAYERS BILLIONS
OF DOLLARS
IF THE 73,000 LATE FILERS ARE ACCEPTED

Members, please step up and make your voice heard in this Farm Bill
debate. I am willing to tell my Senators that I will not cast my vote
for anyone who will not stand up and do what's right instead of worrying
about being politically correct. They should be fiscally responsible
and at the same time listen to their constituients! WE CAN STOP THIS IF
WE RISE UP TOGETHER AND MAKE OUR VOICE HEARD! KEEP CONTACTING THEM
UNTIL THEY HEAR YOU! MAKE SURE THEY RECEIVE YOUR MESSAGE, FAX, E-MAIL,
ETC.

Remember, don't make contacts using the office telephone or computer.
Send your contacts from home or from another location other than the
office, but send them! It would also be great to have others contact
them as well. Tell you friends, CED's, and farmers what's going on in
this Farm Bill debate and they may wish to make contacts as well.
Especially those that have influence with their Senators!

Comments

Have the Republicans taken over Congress again?

My wife Kim (the person you portray so kindly) is the most conscientious, honest, and dedicated government employee I have ever known. I am blessed to hear her heart for farmers and farming every day. She has served her nation and America's farmers for over 25 years of her life. She loves those she serves - black, white, yellow, or red. Like all of us, she hates dishonesty, fraud, waste, and abuse. Seek truth and you will find it. I trust you will.

Mr. DePasquale,
I know nothing of your wife Kim beyond the email she sent urging her federal co-workers to lobby for the removal of the Pigford-related provisions in the House farm bill, and what I learned in a brief conversation with her to verify that she had, in fact, sent that email, and had sent it from a government computer. She also said she did so in part because she had received a version of the email via yet another government computer.

I have no basis for questioning your appraisal of her dedication to her work or her devotion to the farmers she serves. I also don't have the slightest idea why a USDA professional of 25 years would send the email she sent, from a government computer, evidently during business hours.

As for seeking the truth in this matter, that is a job for the appropriate government authorities, and we have brought it to their attention. I leave it to Ms. DePasquale to explain her side of the story when and as she sees fit. I trust she will.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)