cityslickers_inset.jpg

ABOUT KEN

Ken Cook is president of Environmental Working Group, a public interest research and advocacy organization known for its Farm Subsidy Database. The author of dozens of articles, opinion pieces and reports on agricultural, public health and environmental topics, "[Cook's] fingerprints can be found on nearly two decades of U.S. farm law" (Omaha World Herald). Read more about the authors.

Stay connected

Get our monthly eNewsletter, farm policy updates, & the latest farm news. [Privacy policy]


Search the database

Search by city


Search by zip code

Search by beneficiaries's name
(last)
(first)

Search by business name

MULCH VIA EMAIL

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

« Farm Bill: Any Means (Testing) To An End | << Back to main page | Wasting Away, In Farm Bill Vetoville »

Farm Bill: Reforms Cut Off Subsidies To Wealthy
Filthy Rich Still Qualify

Not a subscriber to DTNag.com? Good. Maybe you'll think I came up with this description of the "income caps" farm bill conference principals have hammered out, when in fact it was Chris Clayton at the DTN Ag Policy Blog ("It's Done, Except for the Voting, Veto, etc.")

One of the final hangups was how to deal with adjusted gross income eligibility. Lawmakers agreed to cut off people from commodity payments if they receive more than $500,000 non-farm income. However, farmers can receive up to $750,000 in net farm income before direct payments are cut off. In theory, a person could have $499,000 in stock sales and $749,000 in net farm income and still collect direct payments.

Hmmm. How many tax returns have an adjusted gross income (income after most expenses and decductions) on them of $1,248,000? Let's consult the latest published IRS table on tax returns sorted by AGI:

Adjusted Gross IncomeNumber of ReturnsPercent of ReturnsAverage AGI
Total134,372,678100.0%$55,238
No adjusted gross income1,761,0411.3%-$48,530
$1 under $5,00011,476,4168.5%$2,631
$5,000 under $10,00012,114,2379.0%$7,476
$10,000 under $15,00011,635,6848.7%$12,481
$15,000 under $20,00011,126,5998.3%$17,463
$20,000 under $25,0009,784,1677.3%$22,419
$25,000 under $30,0008,738,1076.5%$27,461
$30,000 under $40,00013,940,40510.4%$34,718
$40,000 under $50,00010,618,5067.9%$44,782
$50,000 under $75,00018,351,03713.7%$61,450
$75,000 under $100,00010,449,9897.8%$86,170
$100,000 under $200,00010,810,3678.0%$132,334
$200,000 under $500,0002,737,8022.0%$288,144
$500,000 under $1,000,000524,5060.4%$677,248
$1,000,000 under $1,500,000127,9250.1%$1,210,080
$1,500,000 under $2,000,00056,615>0.05%$1,722,378
$2,000,000 under $5,000,00084,0700.1%$2,980,990
$5,000,000 under $10,000,00021,431>0.05%$6,852,066
$10,000,000 or more13,776>0.05%$27,313,795

Source: Internal Revenue Service, 2005.

Looks like about three-tenths of one percent (0.3 percent) of all tax returns would exceed that amount. And what fraction of that fraction would be wrapped up in farm programs? I'd tell you but my microscope is on the blink.

Surely the conference committee leaders will be asked at their press conference later today how many people will be caught up in this subsidy crackdown? And how much money these historic "reforms" save taxpayers?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)