Farm Bill: EWG Statement On House Passage
EWG President Ken Cook
Statement On House Passage of 2008 Farm Bill
14 May 2008
Anyone who might have wondered if this Congress would bring a "new direction" to farm policy had their final answer in today's vote in the House of Representatives.
Democrats are supposed to stand on principles of fairness and equity, not sell them. And today they sold them on the cheap.
If the House had displayed even a modicum of political courage and taken on the subsidy lobby, this farm bill could have gone far beyond the miserly spending increases it provides for nutrition assistance to the poor at home and abroad, conservation, farmers markets, organic food, minority farmers and other important priorities that have long been neglected or under-funded. And there would have been money left over to give taxpayers a break.
Apparently the Democratic caucus thought they were log rolling when the subsidy lobby tossed them some twigs.
In a period when crop prices and farm incomes are soaring to record levels, the continuation of bloated subsidies to the largest, most prosperous farms in the country can only be seen as a breathtaking cop-out on the part of congressional leaders.
Environmental Working Group will be highlighting the good and the bad in this legislation in the days ahead, but we already know how the balance will tip relative to the opportunity for reform in this farm bill cycle: on balance the special interests won, and the public interest lost.



Comments
Question. How will the payment limt of $40,000 be applied when a farmer opp for the Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) program?
Ex. Direct payment due agrobuiness farmer $40,000 uses the ACRE program he will get only $28,000 30% of $40,000 but if a agrobuiness farmer is due $60,000 will he get $40,000 direct payment limt or will get $20,000 the direct payment less the 30% of the $60,000. If the agrobuiness get the full $40,000 then it is loop hole for the big farmer to get $20,000 above the payment cap $40,000 for husband and wife.
Posted by: Anonymous | May 16, 2008 8:17 AM
Hi there. I just found your blog and I think it is very interesting. I write on similar topics, but usually from a US farmer’s point of view. I agree that not all farmers should be receiving subsidies, but they are important when catastrophic events happen or countries go to war. I think the 2008 farm bill has done a good job of reducing the amount of farmers that qualify for subsidies. It is not a compete solution, but it is a step in the right direction.
Alex Tiller
http://blog.alextiller.com
Posted by: Alex Tiller | May 19, 2008 5:32 PM