ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Ken Cook

Ken Cook is president of Environmental Working Group, a public interest research and advocacy organization known for its Farm Subsidy Database. The author of dozens of articles, opinion pieces and reports on agricultural, public health and environmental topics, "[Cook's] fingerprints can be found on nearly two decades of U.S. farm law" (Omaha World Herald). Read more about Ken.

Craig Cox

Craig Cox is EWG Midwest Vice President. He Mulches from EWG's office in Ames, IA. Prior to EWG, Craig served as Executive Director of the Soil and Water Conservation Society and was Acting USDA Deputy Under-Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, and Special Assistant to the Chief of USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Michelle Perez

Michelle Perez is EWG's Senior Agriculture Analyst. She has a BA in Biology from Occidental, a Masters from the University of Maryland (UMD) and is finishing up a PhD in agricultural-environmental policy at UMD.

Don Carr

Don Carr is EWG's Press Secretary for agriculture and public lands issues. Prior to EWG, Don worked as a Communications Director for the DNC in his home state of South Dakota and on former Senate Leader Tom Daschle's 2004 reelection campaign.

Stay connected

Sign-up to receive email updates about the latest farm news and farm policy updates. [Privacy policy]


« Therefore, We Shouldn't Have Commodity Programs | << Back to main page | FP's Grunwald Dispelling the 'Renewable' Myth of Biofuels »

Gorillas in the Bay: Time to Face Facts in the Chesapeake

By Michelle Perez, EWG Senior Analyst

Press coverage last week of the latest federal proposals to clean up the Chesapeake Bay was good. But, an important piece of the puzzle was missing from the discussion.

Yes, it's fantastic that President Obama has asked five federal agencies to propose ways they can do their jobs better to restore water quality in the six-state, 64,000 square-mile Bay watershed. And yes, Senator Ben Cardin's (D-Maryland) draft legislation is crucial to give EPA unprecedented power to compel the states to clean up the Bay and punitive authority if they fail to act.

Anyone have power to manage agricultural runoff?

However, these reports and legislation and the resulting press coverage ignores the 800-pound gorilla in the room:

Unintended albeit harmful runoff from agricultural farm fields.

The federal government's reach over farm pollution - which is the single largest source of the nutrient and sediment pollution harming the Bay - is limited to regulating only the largest animal production farms. This leaves the majority of animal farms and the majority of animal waste unregulated by the federal government.

What's worse, there's a huge loophole in the federal animal farm regulation: the feds have no authority over the manure that gets transferred off the regulated farm and onto an unregulated farm where the manure is applied to land as a fertilizer substitute.

The current system isn't working

EWG released a report last week - Facing Facts in the Chesapeake Bay - that points out the real gorilla in our midst:

The inability of the six Bay states (Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, and New York) to cope with the agricultural pollution that the federal government has no jurisdiction over.

Furthermore, EWG's analysis explains why and gives examples of how the voluntary approach that pays farmers to install best management practices that are good for the farm and good for the environment has failed to clean up the unintended pollution.

Here's one way to reduce the farm pollution
Finally, EWG points out that the only way these state governments can show EPA they are truly able to achieve their portion of the upcoming Bay clean-up goals is if they develop a fair and sensible regulatory framework to reduce agricultural pollution.

Read more about what a fair and sensible regulatory framework could look like and find out what agricultural pollution regulations do exist are in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia, and New York.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mulchblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/430

Comments

Manure and compost properly applied does not run off and cause pollution. It adds organic matter to the soil which holds nutrients and soil in place. Synthetic fertilizers destroy organic matter and soil structure which results in run off.

I have yet to see the Science that backs up agriculture as the biggest polluter of the Bay.Considering the town of Centreville, Md pumped millions of gallons of untreated sewage into the Bay for years, was that factored into the anaysis.Are golf courses lumped in with agriculture,they shouldn't be. Does anyone monitor the fertilizer applied by landscapers, no. Do Developers routinely receive variences to build on wetlands, as we speak. Blaming everything on Agriculture is just a lazy approach to a very complex problem.

How does one get on the EWG side...I know people that collect somewhere around $250,000 or more from the EWG and collect social security and state aid program...People that have not had land to farm on for over 5 years now...would not pay the indain res.. their rent and the land was taken from them....How do I get on the list to get free money????

Post a comment

Search the Farm Subsidy Database

MULCH VIA EMAIL


Delivered by FeedBurner

Archive